Tampa Bay Indian Community - tampabayIndian.com
| | | | | | | | | | | |
 


 

Very unhappy: SC on Centre's cherry-picking tribunals' appointments

Delhi,National,Immigration/Law/Rights,Politics

Author : Indo Asian News Service

Immigration/Law/Rights, Politics, National, Delhi, India Read Latest News and Articles

Share With Your Friends



Add an Article

View All Contributions

Add To My Favorite

Add A Picture

New Delhi, Sep 15 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the sanctity of recommendations by panel headed by sitting top court judges for various tribunals, as the government has the last say on the matter.

The bench emphasized that it is distressing that names recommended by selection panel, which comprised of sitting top court judges and two senior bureaucrats, were not treated seriously.

The top court gave Centre two weeks, as the last opportunity, to make good the appointments and furnish reasons for names, which were rejected. "Make all appointments. We give you two weeks' time," said the bench.

The top court expressed its unhappiness to Attorney General (AG) K.K. Venugopal, representing the Centre, with the way the central government has made appointments to the tribunals.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana, and comprising justices D.Y. Chandrachud and L. Nageswara Rao, told the AG it did not appreciate Centre's "cherry-picking" names for appointment after recommendations made by the Search-cum- Selection Committees (SCSC) headed by Supreme Court judges.

"We are very unhappy with what is going on," noted the chief justice, while questioning the Centre as to why recommendations made by SCSC were not accepted. The SCSC shortlists candidates for appointment and then sends it to the Centre for clearance.

The bench pointed out that the SCSC recommended nine judicial members and 10 technical members for National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the appointment letter issued showed "as if members were cherry picked and some were kept on waiting".

It said, "We cannot ignore selected candidates and go to waitlist. What type of selection and appointment is this?"

The AG contended before the bench that the government has power not to accept the recommendation.

The chief justice responded that in a democracy one cannot say recommendations cannot be accepted, and added: "What is the sanctity of recommendations made by panel headed by sitting top court judges, if the government has the last say on the matter?"

--IANS

ss/in


Copyright and Disclaimer: All news and images appearing in our news section, search engines and social media are provided by IANS. If you face any issues related to the content/images, please contact our news service provider directly. We are not liable/responsible for any content/images related to the news service provider.


Latest News

View More News


More News Articles

IPL 2024: All it needs is to win a couple of games and you are back in contention, says Rashid Khan

IPL 2024: All it needs is to win a couple of games and you are back in contention, says Rashid Khan

Aditi Rao Hydari's b'day wish for 'manicorn' Siddharth: 'Endless laughter, happiness'

Aditi Rao Hydari's b'day wish for 'manicorn' Siddharth: 'Endless laughter, happiness'

Why Vidya Malvade says she felt she would become 6 feet tall by end of 'Ruslaan' shoot